Preview

Extreme Medicine

Advanced search

Functional electrical stimulation for gait correction in the early recovery phase after ischemic stroke

https://doi.org/10.47183/mes.2025-268

Abstract

Introduction. Gait dysfunction is a complication of acute cerebrovascular accidents, which is biomechanically manifested as reduced speed and asymmetry in spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters. These impairments can be corrected using functional electrical stimulation (FES) of muscle contraction; however, the available literature primarily describes its application during the late recovery phase of stroke.

Objective. Evaluation of the potential of multichannel FES for gait recovery in early post-stroke rehabilitation.

Materials and methods. The study included 11 patients (2 females and 9 males) aged 46–66 years in the early recovery period after an ischemic stroke (time since stroke onset was 69.1 ± 52.0 days) and 34 healthy subjects (18 females and 16 males) as a control group. The lower limb muscle strength and tone were assessed using the Medical Research Council Scale for Muscle Strength and the modified Ashworth scale, respectively. Gait function was evaluated using the Dynamic Gait Index, Hauser Ambulation Index, Timed-Up-and-Go test, and 10-Meter Walk test. Gait pattern function (b770), obstacle negotiation (d4551), and short-distance walking (d4500) were also examined. All patients underwent a FES therapy course (mean number of sessions — 10.8). Clinical and biomechanical examinations were performed before and after the FES therapy course. Biomechanical gait analysis was conducted using a Stadis system (Neurosoft, Russia). Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistica 12.0 software.

Results. The conducted clinical evaluation demonstrated a minor yet statistically significant functional improvement in post-treatment testing. An increase in the scores of Dynamic Gait Index and 10-Meter Walk test was observed. A decrease in the values of Hauser Index values and the completion time of Timed- Up-and-Go test, as well as in domains (d770) and (d4500), was noted. Gait function showed improvement. The values of walking speed (p < 0.05), double support time on the paretic side (p < 0.05), and m. gastrocnemius activity on both the paretic and unaffected sides (p < 0.05) increased.

Conclusions. The observed changes in gait function were typical of hemiparesis. During the FES therapy course, the patients showed no negative reactions. The clinical and biomechanical gait functions of patients showed minor but positive changes during the FES therapy course. Among biomechanical parameters, the amplitude of the gastrocnemius muscle course on the paretic side significantly increased, which is one of the FES target parameters. Short courses of multichannel FES can be applied in this patient category; however, their effectiveness is insufficient. Approaches to improving the FES effectiveness require further investigation.

About the Authors

D. V. Skvortsov
Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies
Russian Federation

Moscow



N. V. Grebenkina
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Moscow



L. V. Klimov
Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies
Russian Federation

Moscow



S. N. Kaurkin
Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Moscow



M. A. Bulatova
Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Moscow



G. E. Ivanova
Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Katan M, Luft A. Global Burden of Stroke. Seminars in Neurology. 2018;38:208–11. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1649503

2. Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023;147:e93–621. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123

3. Donkor ES. Stroke in the 21st Century: A Snapshot of the Burden, Epidemiology, and Quality of Life. Stroke Research and Treatment. 2018.27;2018:3238165. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3238165

4. Hendricks HT, Van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, Zwarts MJ. Motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review of the literature. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2002;83:1629–37. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.35473

5. Levine DA, Galecki AT, Langa KM, Unverzagt FW, Kabeto MU, Giordani B, et al. Trajectory of Cognitive Decline After Incident Stroke. JAMA. 2015;314:41–51. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.6968

6. Lima DHF, Queiroz AP, Salvo G, Yoneyama SM, Oberg TD, Lima NMFV. Brazilian version of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment: validity, agreement and rehability. Brasilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2010;14:166–75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552010005000006

7. Schmid AA, Wells CK, Concato J, Dallas MI, Lo AC, Nadeau SE, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of poststroke falls in acute hospital setting. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2010;47:553–62.

8. Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors JJ, Culebras A, et al. An Updated Definition of Stroke for the 21st Century. Stroke. 2013;44:2064–89. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca

9. Perry J, Burnfield JM. Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function (2 nd ed.). CRC Press; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003525592

10. Wang Y, Mukaino M, Ohtsuka K, Otaka Y, Tanikawa H, Matsuda F, et al. Gait characteristics of post-stroke hemiparetic patients with different walking speeds. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2020;43(1):69–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000391

11. Skvortsov DV, Kaurkin SN, Ivanova GE. Targeted Biofeedback Training to Improve Gait Parameters in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Sensors. 2024; 24(22):7212. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24227212

12. Skvortsov DV, Grebenkina NV, Kaurkin SN, Ivanova GE. Characteristics of gait function in hemiparetic patients with subacute period of ischemic stroke: a single-center retrospective study. Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical Rehabilitation. 2024;6(3):208–19 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36425/rehab634515

13. Balasubramanian CK, Bowden MG, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Relationship between step length asymmetry and walking performance in subjects with chronic hemiparesis. Archives of Physycal Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2007;88:43–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.004

14. Kim CM, Eng JJ. Symmetry in vertical ground reaction force is accompanied by symmetry in temporal but not distance variables of gait in persons with stroke. Gait and Posture. 2003;18:23–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00122-4

15. Moe JH, Post HW. Functional electrical stimulation for ambulation in hemiplegia. The Lancet. 1962;82:285–8.

16. Kesar TM, Perumal R, Jancosko A, Reisman DS, Rudolph KS, Higginson JS, et al. Novel patterns of functional electrical stimulation have an immediate effect on dorsiflexor muscle function during gait for people poststroke. Physical Therapy. 2010;90(1):55–66. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090140

17. Burridge JH, Taylor PN, Hagan SA, Wood DE, Swain ID. The effects of common peroneal stimulation on the effort and speed of walking: a randomized controlled trial with chronic hemiplegic patients. Clinical Rehabilitation. 1997;11(3):201–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/026921559701100303

18. Robbins SM, Houghton PE, Woodbury MG, Brown JL. The therapeutic effect of functional and transcutaneous electric stimulation on improving gait speed in stroke patients: a meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2006;87(6):853–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.026

19. Araki S, Kawada M, Miyazaki T, Nakai Y, Takeshita Y, Matsuzawa Y, et al. Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Gluteus Medius during Gait in Patients following a Stroke. Biomed Research International. 2020;2020:8659845. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8659845

20. Santos GF, Jakubowitz E, Pronost N, Bonis T, Hurschler C. Predictive simulation of post-stroke gait with functional electrical stimulation. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):21351. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00658-z

21. Paternostro-Sluga T, Grim-Stieger M, Posch M, Schuhfried O, Vacariu G, Mittermaier C, et al. Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2008;40(8):665–71. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0235

22. Suponeva NA, Yusupova DG, Ilyina KA, Melchenko DA, Butkovskaya AA, Zhirova ES, et al. Validation of the modified Ashworth scale in Russia. Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology. 2020;14(1):89–96 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25692/ACEN.2020.1.10

23. Jonsdottir J, Cattaneo D. Reliability and validity of the dynamic gait index in persons with chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2007;88(11):1410–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.109

24. Hauser SL, Dawson DM, Lehrich JR, Beal MF, Kevy SV, Propper RD, et al. Intensive immunosuppression in progressive multiple sclerosis. A randomized, threearm study of high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange, and ACTH. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1983;308(4):173–80. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198301273080401

25. Chan PP, Tou JI, Tse MM, Ng SS. Reliability and Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test with a Motor Task in People with Chronic Stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2017;98(11):2213–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.008

26. Watson MJ. Refining the ten-metre walking test for use with neurologically impaired people. Physiotherapy. 2002;88(7):386–97.

27. Melnikova EV, Builova TV, Bodrova RA, Shmonin AA, Maltseva MN, Ivanova GE. Use of the international classification of functioning (icf) in outpatient and inpatient medical rehabilitation: instruction for specialists. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2017;6(82):7–20 (In Russ.). EDN: ZVGCHN

28. Ivanova GE, Melnikova EV, Shmonin AA, Verbitskay EV, Aronov DM, Belkin AA, et al. Application of the international classification of functioning in the process of medical rehabilitation. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2018;(88):2–77 (In Russ.). EDN: YOTJKP

29. Mitsutake T, Sakamoto M, Horikawa E. The effects of electromyography-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation plus tilt sensor functional electrical stimulation training on gait performance in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2019;42(4):358–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000371

30. Wang J, Zhao L, Gao Y, Liu C, Dong X, He X. The difference between the effectiveness of body-weight-supported tread-mill training combined with functional electrical stimulation and sole body-weight-supported treadmill training for improving gait parameters in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Neurology. 2022;13:1003723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1003723

31. Dujović SD, Malešević J, Malešević N, Vidaković AS, Bijelić G, Keller T, et al. Novel multi-pad functional electrical stimulation in stroke patients: A single-blind randomized study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;41(4):791–800.

32. Matsumoto S, Shimodozono M, Noma T, Miyara K, Onoda T, Ijichi R, et al. Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation in Convalescent Stroke Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023;12(7):2638. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072638

33. Wonsetler EC, Bowden MG. A systematic review of mechanisms of gait speed change post-stroke. Part 1: spatiotemporal parameters and asymmetry ratios. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2017;24(6):435–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2017.1285746

34. Güzel S, Karaca Umay E, Öztürk EA, Çakci A. The efficiency of functional electrical stimulation and balance-weighted rehabilitation therapy in stroke patients with-foot-drop: a pilot study. Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences. 2022;25(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.31609/jpmrs.2021-82149

35. Almeida ASSC, Viana da Cruz AT, Candeira SRA, Cardozo do Nascimento NI, Santar de Castro KJ, Costa de Lima R, et al. Late physiotherapy rehabilitation changes gait patterns in post-stroke patients. Biomedical Human Kinetics. 2017;9(1):14–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/bhk-2017-0003

36. Skvortsov DV, Kaurkin SN, Ivanova GE. A Study of Biofeedback Gait Training in Cerebral Stroke Patients in the Early Recovery Phase with Stance Phase as Target Parameter. Sensors. 2021;21:7217. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217217

37. Skvortsov DV, Klimov LV, Grebenkina NV. Functional electrical stimulation method: recommended application parameters. Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical Rehabilitation. 2024;6(3):263–79. https://doi.org/10.36425/rehab635187


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Skvortsov D.V., Grebenkina N.V., Klimov L.V., Kaurkin S.N., Bulatova M.A., Ivanova G.E. Functional electrical stimulation for gait correction in the early recovery phase after ischemic stroke. Extreme Medicine. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47183/mes.2025-268

Views: 24


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2713-2757 (Print)
ISSN 2713-2765 (Online)