Preview

Extreme Medicine

Advanced search

Hidden burden of chronic non-communicable diseases. Part 2: prevalence of germline variants associated with cancers among residents of the Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.47183/mes.2025-366

Abstract

Introduction. Cancer is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Hereditary (germline) mutations in cancer predisposition genes significantly contribute to oncogenesis (accounting for 3–12.6% of adult cases). Identifying carriers of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants is crucial for cancer prevention and its early detection. Large-scale data on the prevalence of such variants in the general population of the Russian Federation, essential for healthcare resource planning, have been extremely limited until now.

Objective. To assess the prevalence and spectrum of pathogenic and likely pathogenic germline variants in genes associated with cancer risk in a Russian population cohort.

Materials and methods. An analysis of whole-genome sequencing data from 116,794 participants (a representative sample of the adult population from 86 federal subjects of the Russian Federation) was conducted. The search for P/LP variants in cancer-associated genes was performed based on the ClinVar database. Variant annotation was carried out considering the level of evidence. Statistical analysis was performed using Python (v3.9.12).

Results. P/LP variants were identified in 26 cancer-associated genes among 2643 participants (2.26%). The most frequent variant was rs36053993 (MUTYH, 0.28%), with its frequency in the Russian Federation being lower than in global databases (ALFA, gnomAD). Level A variants (only those with the “reviewed by expert panel” level of evidence) were carried by 0.8% of individuals collectively. Level B variants (those with the “reviewed by expert panel” and “criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts” levels of evidence) were carried by 2.08%. The inclusion of less reliable evidence levels (C, D) increased this proportion only marginally, to 2.26%. A statistically significant decrease in the proportion of carriers of Level A variants with age was observed (p = 0.007), while the overall proportion of P/LP variant carriers decreased only slightly (p = 0.17). Substantial geographical variability in prevalence was identified, ranging from 865 (Bashkortostan) to 6250 (Chechnia) variants per 100,000 population. In Moscow, the prevalence was 2340 per 100,000.

Conclusions. The study revealed a significant “hidden burden” of P/LP oncogenic germline variant carriers (2.26%) in the Russian population. The primary burden is attributed to variants with a high level of evidence (Level B). The substantial variability in prevalence across regions of the Russian Federation necessitates a differentiated approach to healthcare resource planning. The data obtained substantiate the need for implementing genetic screening programs (especially for individuals with a family history) and enhanced oncological surveillance for carriers. This represents a strategic direction for reducing cancer incidence and mortality in high genetic risk groups within the Russian Federation.

About the Authors

V. S. Yudin
Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency
Russian Federation

Moscow



A. A. Mamchur
Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency
Russian Federation

Moscow



E. A. Nikolaeva
Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency
Russian Federation

Moscow



M. V. Ivanov
Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency
Russian Federation

Moscow



D. A. Kashtanova
Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency
Russian Federation

Moscow



E. A. Zelenova
Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency
Russian Federation

Moscow



S. I. Mitrofanov
Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency
Russian Federation

Moscow



E. A. Snigir
Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency
Russian Federation

Moscow



L. P. Kuzmina
Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health
Russian Federation

Moscow



A. A. Keskinov
Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. GBD 2021 Forecasting Collaborators. Burden of disease scenarios for 204 countries and territories, 2022–2050: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet. 2024;403(10440):2204–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00685-8

2. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2024;74(3):229–63. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834

3. Han SA, Kim SW. BRCA and Breast Cancer-Related High-Penetrance Genes. Translational Research in Breast Cancer. 2021;1187:473–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9620-6_25

4. Kolekar P, Balagopal V, Dong L, Liu Y, Foy S, Tran Q, et al. SJPedPanel: A Pan-Cancer Gene Panel for Childhood Malignancies to Enhance Cancer Monitoring and Early Detection. Clinical Cancer Research. 2024;30(18):4100–14. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1063

5. Bader JS. The Panorama of Cancer Genetics. Cancer Research. 2021;81(10):2586–7. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-0885

6. Wu S, Zhu W, Thompson P, Hannun YA. Evaluating intrinsic and non-intrinsic cancer risk factors. Nature Communications. 2018;9(1):3490. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05467-z

7. Hu C, Hart SN, Gnanaolivu R, Huang H, Lee KY, Na J, et al. A population-based study of genes previously implicated in breast cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;384(5):440–51. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2005936

8. Yang X, Song H, Leslie G, Engel C, Hahnen E, Auber B, et al. Ovarian and breast cancer risks associated with pathogenic variants in RAD51C and RAD51D. Journal of National Cancer Institute. 2020;112(12):1242–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa030

9. Kastrinos F, Samadder NJ, Burt RW. Use of family history and genetic testing to determine risk of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(2):389–403. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.029

10. Janssen B, Bellis S, Koller T, Tischkowitz M, Liau SS. A systematic review of predicted pathogenic PALB2 variants: an analysis of mutational overlap between epithelial cancers. Journal of Human Genetics. 2020;65(2):199–205. https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-019-0680-7

11. Wang Y, Zhou B, Ru J, Meng X, Wang Y, Liu W, et al. Advances in computational methods for identifying cancer driver genes. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering. 2023;20(12):21643–69. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2023958

12. Shickh S, Gutierrez Salazar M, Zakoor KR, Lazaro C, Gu J, Goltz J, et al. Exome and genome sequencing in adults with undiagnosed disease: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2021;58(4):275–83. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-106936

13. Kalia SS, Adelman K, Bale SJ, Chung WK, Eng C, Evans JP, et al. Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genetics in Medicine. 2017;19(2):249–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.190

14. Miller DT, Lee K, Chung WK, Gordon AS, Herman GE, Klein TE, et al. ACMG SF v3.0 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genetics in Medicine. 2021;23(8):1381–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01172-3

15. Bowling KM, Thompson ML, Finnila CR, Hiatt SM, Latner DR, Amaral MD, et al. Genome sequencing as a first-line diagnostic test for hospitalized infants. Genetics in Medicine. 2022;24(4):851–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.020

16. Harrison SM, Biesecker LG, Rehm HL. Overview of Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines. Current Protocols in Human Genetics. 2019;103(1):e93. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphg.93

17. Li Q, Wang K. InterVar: Clinical Interpretation of Genetic Variants by the 2015 ACMG-AMP Guidelines. ASHG. 2017;100(2):267–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.004

18. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Weinstein JN, Collison EA, Mills GB, Mills Shaw KR, Ozenberger BA, et al. The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project. Nature Genetics. 2013;45(10):1113–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2764

19. Gusakova M, Dzhumaniiazova I, Zelenova E, Kashtanova D, Ivanov M, Mamchur A, et al. Prevalence of the cancer-associated germline variants in Russian adults and long-living individuals: using the ACMG recommendations and computational interpreters for pathogenicity assessment. Frontiers in Oncology. 2024;14:1420176. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1420176

20. Kim S, Scheffler K, Halpern AL, Bekritsky MA, Noh E, Kallberg M, et al. Strelka2: fast and accurate calling of germline and somatic variants. Nature Methods. 2018;15:591–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0051-x

21. Virolainen SJ, VonHandorf A, Viel KCMF, Weirauch MT, Kottyan LC. Gene-environment interactions and their impact on human health. Genes and Immunology. 2023;24(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41435-022-00192-6

22. Kaehler M, Cascorbi I. Germline variants in cancer therapy. Cancer Drug Resistance. 2019;2(1):18–30. https://doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2019.05


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Yudin V.S., Mamchur A.A., Nikolaeva E.A., Ivanov M.V., Kashtanova D.A., Zelenova E.A., Mitrofanov S.I., Snigir E.A., Kuzmina L.P., Keskinov A.A. Hidden burden of chronic non-communicable diseases. Part 2: prevalence of germline variants associated with cancers among residents of the Russian Federation. Extreme Medicine. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47183/mes.2025-366

Views: 64


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2713-2757 (Print)
ISSN 2713-2765 (Online)