Surgical management of a gunshot comminuted forearm fracture with distal major vessel injury in a field hospital
https://doi.org/10.47183/mes.2026-463
Abstract
Introduction. Modern combat trauma, especially mine‑blast extremity injuries, often results in severe combined injuries with near-complete avulsions, critical ischemia, and extensive tissue defects. The relevance of limb salvage is determined by medical and socio‑psychological aspects. However, the implementation of complex reconstructive techniques in a field military hospital setting is associated with extreme factors and requires adaptation of the “damage control” principles (Damage Control Surgery).
Objective. To analyze a comprehensive surgical approach to limb salvage in cases of near-complete traumatic hand amputation complicated by vascular insufficiency, using a clinical case example in a level 2 field military hospital.
Case description. A clinical case of a mine-explosive injury to the left upper extremity in a 38-year-old serviceman is presented. The injury involved near-complete avulsion of the hand, comminuted fractures of the forearm bones, an extensive soft tissue defect, and critical ischemia. Treatment involved a multidisciplinary consultation and the execution of the following in a single surgical series: 1) extensive primary surgical debridement of the wound, 2) external fixation of the radius using a military external fixation kit, 3) microsurgical autovenous grafting of the radial artery with a reversed graft from the great saphenous vein of the leg. Intraoperative monitoring was performed using pulse oximetry and ultrasound angioscanning. As a result of the operation, main arterial blood flow to the hand was restored (pulsation in the radial artery, SpO2 90% on the finger, blood flow velocity in the superficial palmar arch 100 cm/s according to ultrasound angioscanning). The condition of the limb improved postoperatively: the hand became warm and pink. After 4 hours, the patient was evacuated for further staged treatment. Successful early revascularization was made possible by the sequential combination of Damage Control Surgery principles (radical primary surgical debridement and minimally invasive fracture stabilization) and complex microsurgical reconstruction. Key success factors included the short ischemia time, a carefully considered decision by the consultation, and the selection of a distant (lower leg) donor site for vein graft harvesting to reduce the risk of infection and preserve venous outflow in the injured limb. This case demonstrates the possibility of bringing elements of specialized surgical care to more forward stages of medical evacuation in modern armed conflicts.
Conclusions. This experience demonstrates that limb salvage in severe combat injuries with a vascular component is possible at the stage of qualified surgical care (Level 2 hospital), provided there is a multidisciplinary approach, readiness to perform microsurgical interventions, and strict adherence to the principles of staged treatment. The success of initial revascularization is critically important, but represents only the first step in a long process of subsequent reconstructive and rehabilitative measures aimed at restoring function.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. N. KazantsevRussian Federation
A. I. Chaava
Russian Federation
D. Yu. Neskoromny
Russian Federation
O. V. Alekseev
Russian Federation
References
1. Vasilchenko MV, Volchkov VA, Bunin SA, Rychkov VL, Rumyantsev AV, Volchkov GV. Analysis of the structure of combat injuries sustained during special military operation (based on the experience of the providing qualified and specialized surgical care in a multidisciplinary hospital). The Journal of Emergency Surgery named after I.I. Dzhanelidze. 2025;1:16–22 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54866/27129632_2025_1_16
2. Klimovich AM, Frumen AG, Beregovskii DA, Efimtsev AYu, Trufanov GE. Mine blast injuries: X-ray and computed tomographic diagnostics of limb injuries. Russian Journal for Personalized Medicine. 2025;5(3):230–50 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18705/2782-3806-2025-5-3-230-250
3. Trishkin DV. Results of the medical service activities of the armed forces of the Russian Federation in 2023 and goals for 2024. Russian Military Medicine Journal. 2025;346(1):4–20 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52424/00269050_2024_346_1_4
4. Kasimov RR, Prosvetov VA, Samokhvalov IM, Zavrazhnov AA, Kovalenko SA, Fedotov AO, et al. The structure of combat surgical trauma and features of surgical care in advanced medical groups in the active phase of hostilities. Russian Military Medicine Journal. 2024;345(7):4–12 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52424/00269050_2024_345_7_4
5. Amonov LA, Makhsudov FM, Saypiyev AA, Khodzhanov IYu, Novikov KI, Sergeev KS. Incomplete traumatic arruption of the upper limb: tactics of limb saving in the conflict of angioand osteotasks. Polytrauma. 2025;2:65–70 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/1819-1495-2025-2-65-70
6. Kalina AV, Kostyuchenko MV. 60 years of the first successful upper limb replantation. Bulletin of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy. 2022;1(1):26–9 (In Russ.). EDN: QGZXCU
7. Batyrshin IM, Kizyavka MI, Sklizkov DS, Ostroumova YuS, Mikhelson EP, Borodina MA, et al. Application of the damage control principles and the use of a local negative pressure system for the prevention of infectious complications in a patient with traumatic separation of the upper limb and massive damage to soft tissues. Wounds and Wound Infections. The prof. B.M. Kostyuchenok Journal. 2019;6(4):22–5 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25199/2408-9613-2019-6-4-22-25
8. Agalaryan AKh, Gilev YaKh, Skopintsev DA, Yakushin OA, Rotkin EA, Drugov AS, et al. Surgical treatment of massive injury to soft tissues in traumatic disruption of the lower extremity in a patient with polytrauma. Polytrauma. 2016;4:81– 4 (In Russ.). EDN: XISGSB
9. Kholmatov VN, Kazantsev AN, Bolibok NV, Belyai ZhM, Tenishev RR, Gaptrakipov IKh. Surgical treatment of a mineblast wound with the formation of a false aneurism of the popliteal artery in the conditions of a field hospital of the special military operation zone. Polytrauma. 2025;3:44–50 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/1819-1495-2025-3-44-50
10. Merkulov DS, Fistal EYa, Demchuk VO. Revascularizative surgery in the treatment of combat surgical trauma. Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery. 2024;27(2):72–81 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52581/1814-1471/89/08
11. Chupryaev VA, Kudyashev AL, Khominets VV, Badalov VI, Strelba AA. Features of the treatment of wounded with amputation defects of the lower extremities in combination with bone fractures. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center. 2024;19(1):143–8 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25881/20728255_2024_19_1_143
12. Korol SA. Medical evacuation in the system of proving care for wounded persons with gunshot fractures of the tibia and extremity avulsion during the antiterrorist operation. Trauma. 2016;17(4):92–5 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22141/1608-1706.4.17.2016.77497
13. Ivchenko EV, Ovchinnikov DV. The main scientific and practical results of the study at the Military Medical Academy of combat pathology during the Special Military operation. Russian Military Medical Academy Reports. 2024;43(4):457– 69 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/rmmar636549
14. Momotov DV, Afanasyeva TN, Ivashchenko AN, Kovalev AS, Nikolaev KN, Yudenkov SN. Modern aspects of rehabilitation of military personnel with amputated limbs due to mine-explosive wounds. The Doctor. 2025;36(3):40–6 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2025-03-07
15. Suprunov IK, Skryabin EG. Hand injuries sustained while contacting operating electric meat grinders (literature review illustrated with authors’ clinical cases). Orthopaedic Genius. 2025;31(1):83–90 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2025-31-1-83-90
16. Kyshtymov SA, Belov AK, Simashko AA, Grigoryev EG. Mine-blast injury of the knee joint with damage to the popliteal artery. Polytrauma. 2025;1:41–5 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/1819-1495-2025-1-41-45
17. Gaivoronsky AI, Kim-Skaliitchouk BV, Svistov DV, Isaev DM, Churikov LI. On the issue of modern classification of peripheral nervous system’s combat injuries. Kazan Medical Journal. 2024;105(5):760–70 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/KMJ375372
18. Isengaliev IN, Khrapov YuV, Gaivoronsky AI, Gizatullin ShKh, Davydov DV, Besedin VD, et al. Simultaneous nerve reconstruction and tendonmuscular transposition in gunshot wounds of the common peroneal nerve. Russian Neurosurgical Journal named after Professor A.L. Polenov. 2024;16(4):12–21 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.56618/2071-2693_2024_16_4_12
19. Gaivoronsky AI, Svistov DV, Kolomentsev SV, Ovchinnikov DV, Ivchenko EV, Onnintsev IE, et al. Approach to neurosurgical care for combat-related injuries to the peripheral nervous system. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2024;26(4):627–38 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/brmma634434
Review
For citations:
Kazantsev A.N., Chaava A.I., Neskoromny D.Yu., Alekseev O.V. Surgical management of a gunshot comminuted forearm fracture with distal major vessel injury in a field hospital. Extreme Medicine. https://doi.org/10.47183/mes.2026-463
JATS XML








