Functioning principles of the network of biological risk monitoring of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia

Introduction. The activity aimed at biological risk monitoring (BRM) ensures timely response against emerging biological threats in order to prevent their negative impact on human health. The improvement and further development of the existing network of BRM of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency (FMBA) of Russia requires understanding of its functioning principles.

Objective. Substantiation of the functioning principles of the BRM network in the entitled territories and organizations of the FMBA.

Materials and methods. The study was conducted using the automated information system of the FMBA Center for BRM, which aggregates BRM data from the territories and organizations serviced by FMBA. The methods of systems analysis, reverse engineering, classical logic, analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization, categorization, and classification were used.

Results and discussion. A comprehensive study of the operating BRM network of FMBA was conducted. Its aims, objectives, functions, characteristics, and activities were examined. Using the method of reverse engineering, 19 key principles of the BRM network were substantiated. These principles were classified based on stratification of classes according to the types of activities that ensure the BRM network functioning as a complex organizational system. As a result, the principles were distinguished into informational and technological, organizational and managerial, and scientific and practical classes.

Conclusions. The functioning principles of the MBR network in the territories and organizations serviced by the FMBA were identified, formulated, substantiated, and classified. These include the use of the systems approach, the principle of continuous monitoring and reporting, the principle of comprehensive information and analytical support, etc. The results obtained can be used as the basis for decision making when optimizing the technology of BRM monitoring by FMBA.

1. Voronina LP. On guard of environmental protection and public health. Ed. of Yudin SM. Moscow: Kvant Media; 2024 (In Russ.).

2. Botalov NS, Nekrasova TM, Botalova NI, Lukyantseva SA, Karpunina TI. Microbiological monitoring of pathogens of nosocomial infections from the ESKAPE group in medical organizations in Perm. Bacteriology. 2024;9(3):57–61 (In Russ.). EDN: GPRIQK

3. Yarets YUI. Pathogenic potential of ESKAPE group bacteria isolated from wounds: characteristics of phenotypic and genotypic markers and the possibility of their practical application. Journal of the Grodno State Medical University. 2022;20(4):400–13. https://doi.org/10.25298/2221-8785-2022-20-4-400-413

4. Sharma RS, Mannava PN, Wingreen SC. Reverse-Engineering the Design Rules for Cloud-Based Big Data Platforms. Cloud Computing and Data Science. 2022;3(2):39–99. https://doi.org/10.37256/ccds.3220221213

5. Onishchenko GG, Smolensky VY, Yezhlova EB, Demina YV, Toporkov VP, Toporkov AB, et al. Actual problems of biological safety in modern conditions. Part 3. Scientific support for national standardization of a wide format of biological safety. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2014;69(11–12):118–27 (In Russ.). EDN: TFPXWP

6. Hazelrigg G, Saari D. Toward a Theory of Systems Engineering. Journal of Mechanical Design. 2022, 144(1): 011402. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051873

7. Karpenko PP, Selezneva AV, Pelagejko AV, Chebunina MV, Buravczova DA, Bashkinceva MV. Fundamentals of system analysis. Stolypin Annals. 2022;4(4):27 (In Russ.). EDN: CATZFJ

8. Melnikov OA, Kraevoy SA, Bolekhan VN. Threats and risks to health in emergency situations: biomedical, predictive analytical, and mathematical aspects. Extreme Medicine. 2024;26(4):13–20 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47183/mes.2024-26-4-13-20

9. Blauer B, Brownstein J, Gardner L, Kraemer M, Leiva R, Mathieu E, et al. Innovative platforms for data aggregation, linkage and analysis in the context of pandemic and epidemic intelligence. Euro Surveillance. 2023;28(24):pii=2200860. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.24.2200860

10. Zhigili IU. Automation of business processes using information systems. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2024;10-2(97):207–9 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-1000-2024-10-2-207-209

11. Glazkova KV, Lubyanskaya EB, Agafonova MS. Information management in the management of organizations: information and analytical approaches in the management system of the organization. Digital and Industry Economics. 2022;1(26):75–80 (In Russ.). EDN: WDYOYK

12. Papkin AS. Information and analytical support for government agencies. Russian Science and Education: Problems and Prospects. 2021;3(40):23–6 (In Russ.). EDN: APXBRQ

13. Petrovskaya OV. Principles of reliability in information law in the context of digital transformation. Monitoring of Law Enforcement. 2021;3(40):46–50 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21681/2226-0692-2021-3-46-50

14. Romanova EA, Sibileva EA. Improvement of personnel management systems as the basis for the strategic development of the organization. Russian Economic Bulletin. 2020;3(2):150–5 (In Russ.). EDN: YDIVBU

15. Kazarina SG, Gulyaeva TJ. Terminological systems of the sublanguage of medicine: a structural and typological aspect. Philological Sciences. Questions of Theory and Practice. 2023;16(5):1395–9 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20230223

16. Morán-Blanco S. Sustainable Development in international relations theory: its presence or abscence. A proposal for a new paradigm. Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies. 2022;11(2):78–100. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.682

17. Makarova VV. Analysis of the evolution of the concept of sustainable development. Economic Sciences. 2023;10(227):249–57 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14451/1.227.249