Group and individual characteristics of orthostatic tolerance in participants of the one-year SIRIUS-23 isolation experiment
https://doi.org/10.47183/mes.2026-542
Abstract
Introduction. Prolonged isolation and hypokinesia are known to reduce orthostatic tolerance, posing a significant safety risk for space crews, particularly in the context of prospective interplanetary missions. Despite extensive research, the physiological mechanisms driving vascular dysfunction in these conditions remain poorly understood, and no reliable individual predictors of orthostatic intolerance have been identified to date.
Objective. To analyze changes in the regulatory mechanisms of the cardiovascular system based on heart rate variability and hemodynamic parameters in response to an orthostatic challenge during the one‑year SIRIUS‑23 isolation experiment.
Materials and methods. The study was conducted as part of the SIRIUS‑23 isolation experiment, during a 12‑month isolation period, in a ground‑based experimental facility. Six healthy volunteers participated: two men (age 34 ± 3 years, BMI 24.9 ± 2.8 kg/m²) and four women (age 30 ± 5 years, BMI 23.1 ± 2.2 kg/m²). Five assessment sessions were scheduled at 2–3-month intervals throughout the isolation period, beginning one month after confinement. Additionally, a baseline session was carried out one to three days prior to the start of isolation, and a follow‑up (post‑exposure) session was conducted during the recovery period. In each session, an active orthostatic test was performed with recording of heart rate variability (HRV) and hemodynamic parameters. The data were processed using the Statgraphics 18 software package.
Results. Exposure to isolation conditions resulted in a statistically significant reduction in resting heart rate (F = 3.43; p = 0.011) and a marked decline in autonomic reactivity during the active stand test from Month 3 onward. Specifically, the relative increase in the LF component was significantly blunted (F = 3.29; p = 0.015), whereas the HF component exhibited a pronounced negative increase (F = 3.64; p = 0.009). Individual analysis revealed considerable heterogeneity in response patterns. In most participants, the observed “economization” of autonomic regulation appeared to be adaptive, as the rise in mean arterial pressure during orthostasis remained consistently positive. However, one female participant exhibited signs of decompensation by the end of the isolation period, manifested as exhaustion of sympathetic vasomotor activation: the LF component during orthostasis decreased to 197 ms² compared with 480 ms² in the supine position, and HF dropped to 16 ms². This resulted in a diminished rise in mean arterial pressure, which reached negative values.
Conclusions. The key determinant of orthostatic tolerance is the state of the autonomic nervous system, rather than anthropometric parameters or aerobic capacity. The obtained data substantiate the need for individual monitoring of autonomic regulation to predict the risks of maladaptation in extreme conditions.
Keywords
About the Authors
M. V. FedchukRussian Federation
Moscow
O. V. Popova
Russian Federation
Moscow
V. B. Rusanov
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Kotovskaya AR, Koloteva MI. Development of human cardiovascular deconditioning on the stage of returning to earth after stay in microgravity. Aerospace and Environmental Medicine. 2016;50(1):13–6 (In Russ.). EDN: VPAYLN
2. Aubert AE, Larina I, Momken I, Blanc S, White O, Kim Prisk G, Linnarsson D. Towards human exploration of space: the THESEUS review series on cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal research priorities. NPJ Microgravity. 2016;2:16031. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjmgrav.2016.31
3. Meck JV, Reyes CJ, Perez SA, Goldberger AL, Ziegler MG. Marked exacerbation of orthostatic intolerance after long- vs. short-duration spaceflight in veteran astronauts. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2001;63(6):865–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200111000-00003
4. Tank J, Baevsky RM, Funtova II, Diedrich A, Slepchenkova IN, Jordan J. Orthostatic heart rate responses after prolonged space flights. Clinical Autonomic Research. 2011;21(2):121–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-010-0106-2
5. Platts SH, Tuxhorn JA, Ribeiro LC, Stenger MB, Lee SM, Meck JV. Compression garments as countermeasures to orthostatic intolerance. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. 2009;80(5):437–42. https://doi.org/10.3357/asem.2473.2009
6. Levine BD, Zuckerman JH, Pawelczyk JA. Cardiac atrophy after bed-rest deconditioning: a nonneural mechanism for orthostatic intolerance. Circulation. 1997;96(2):517–25. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.2.517
7. Goldstein DS, Pechnik S, Holmes C, Eldadah B, Sharabi Y. Association between supine hypertension and orthostatic hypotension in autonomic failure. Hypertension. 2003;42(2):136–42. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000081216.11623.C3
8. Delp MD, Colleran PN, Wilkerson MK, McCurdy MR, MullerDelp JM. Structural and functional remodeling of skeletal muscle microvasculature is induced by simulated microgravity. American Journal of Physiology — Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2000;278(6):H1866–73. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.6.H1866
9. Behnke BJ, Zawieja DC, Gashev AA, Ray CA, Delp MD. Diminished mesenteric vaso- and venoconstriction and elevated plasma ANP and BNP with simulated microgravity. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2008;104(5):1273–80. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00954.2006
10. Purdy RE, Duckles SP, Krause DN, Rubera KM, Sara D. Effect of simulated microgravity on vascular contractility. Journal of Applied Physiology. 1998;85(4):1307–15. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1998.85.4.1307
11. Kotovskaya AR, Fomina GA. Prediction of human orthostatic tolerance by changes in arterial and venous hemodynamics in the microgravity environment. Human Physiology. 2013;39(5):25 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7868/S0131164613050081
12. Hoffmann F, Rabineau J, Mehrkens D, Gerlach DA, Moestl S, Johannes BW, et al. Cardiac adaptations to 60 day headdown-tilt bed rest deconditioning. Findings from the AGBRESA study. ESC Heart Fail. 2021;8(1):729–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13103
13. Jordan J, Limper U, Tank J. Cardiovascular autonomic nervous system responses and orthostatic intolerance in astronauts and their relevance in daily medicine. Neurological Sciences. 2022;43(5):3039–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-05963-7
14. Fomina GA, Kotovskaya AR, Pochuev VI, Zhernavkov AF. Mechanisms of changes in human hemodynamics under the conditions of microgravity and prognosis of postflight orthostatic stability. Human Physiology. 2008;34(3):92–7 (In Russ.). EDN: IKPTZH
15. Basner M, Dinges DF, Mollicone DJ, Savelev I, Ecker AJ, Di Antonio A, et al. Psychological and behavioral changes during confinement in a 520-day simulated interplanetary mission to Mars. PloS ONE. 2014;9(3):e93298. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093298
16. Groemer G, Gruber S, Übermasser S, Soucek A, Lalla E, Lousada J, et al. The AMADEE-18 Mars analog expedition in the Dhofar region of Oman. Astrobiology. 2020;20(11):1276–86. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2019.2031
17. Dunn Rosenberg J, Jannasch A, Binsted K, Landry S. Biobehavioral and psychosocial stress changes during three 8-12-month spaceflight analog missions with Mars-like conditions of isolation and confinement. Frontiers in Physiology. 2022;13:898841. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.898841
18. Gonçalves TR, Farinatti PTV, Gurgel JL, Soares PPS. Correlation between cardiac autonomic modulation in response to orthostatic stress and indicators of quality of life, physical capacity, and physical activity in healthy individuals. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2015;29(5):1415–21. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000769
19. Gurfinkel’ YuI, Katse NV, Makeeva OV, Mikhaylov VM. Possibilities of using computerized capillaroscopy in space medicine and clinical practice. In: Surovyatkina ED, Breus TK, Ivanov GG, Vostrikov VA, Gurfinkel’ YuI, Gorshkov VA, eds. Methods of Nonlinear Analysis in Cardiology and Oncology: Physical Approaches and Clinical Practice. Issue 2. Moscow: Knizhnyy Dom Universitet; 2010 (In Russ.). EDN: TCNBVX
20. Hickam JB, Cargill WH, Golden A. Cardiovascular reactions to emotional stimuli. effect on the cardiac output, arteriovenous oxygen difference, arterial pressure, and peripheral resistance. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1948;27(2):290–8. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI101946
21. Nordkamp L, Dijk N, Wieling W. Orthostatic challenge tests: active standing and head-up tilt. Electrical Diseases of the Heart. 2013;2:197–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4978-1_12
22. Convertino VA. Neurohumoral mechanisms associated with orthostasis: reaffirmation of the significant contribution of the heart rate response. Frontiers in Physiology. 2014;5:236. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00236
23. Fedchuk MV, Rusanov VB, Nosovsky AM, Orlov OI. Application of the method of variance analysis in small sample statistics in biomedical research. Human Physiology. 2025;51(5):121–30 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034615025050115
24. Freeman R, Abuzinadah AR, Gibbons CH, Jones P, Miglis MG, Sinn DI. Orthostatic Hypotension: JACC State-ofthe-Art Review. JACC. 2018;72(11):1294–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.079
25. Piccirillo G, Naso C, Moisè A, Lionetti M, Nocco M, Di Carlo S, et al. Heart rate and blood pressure variability in subjects with vasovagal syncope. Clinical Science. 2004;107(1):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20030327
26. Furlan R, Porta A, Costa F, Tank J, Baker L, Schiavi R, et al. Oscillatory patterns in sympathetic neural discharge and cardiovascular variables during orthostatic stimulus. Circulation. 2000;101(8):886–92. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.8.886
27. Domrachev AA, Domracheva MYa. Profitability of functioning of cardiovascular system as the parameter of functional physiological assessment of the condition of the organism in the conditions of psychophysical activity. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2017;(5-1):59–65 (In Russ.). EDN: YNWBYP
28. Convertino VA, Doerr DF, Eckberg DL, Fritsch JM, VernikosDanellis J. Head-down bed rest impairs vagal baroreflex responses and provokes orthostatic hypotension. Journal of Applied Physiology. 1990;68(4):1458–64. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1990.68.4.1458
Review
For citations:
Fedchuk M.V., Popova O.V., Rusanov V.B. Group and individual characteristics of orthostatic tolerance in participants of the one-year SIRIUS-23 isolation experiment. Extreme Medicine. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47183/mes.2026-542
JATS XML








